Showing posts with label Evil Dead. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evil Dead. Show all posts

Equinox and the Odd Story Behind a Fan-Made, Theatrically-Released Horror Film

0 comments

If you follow the film industry as much as I do, then you'll know how often directors clash with studio executives when determining the final cuts of big-budget films. Such conflicts between the artists who create the art and the people who fund the art and mistakenly think that they are artists too have resulted in a long, long list of expensive failures. (Alien 3 (1992) and The Invasion (2007) immediately comes to mind.) Of course, it continues to happen--so much so with Hollywood productions that it's almost inevitable at this point--but how would you feel if the same thing happened with the theatrical release of a low-budget, fan-made film?


Such was the case with Equinox. It began as an amateur horror fan film made in 1967 (its original title: The Equinox: Journey into the Supernatural), and then it was re-edited, partially re-shot and distributed theatrically by Tonylyn Productions in 1970. For a long time, the Tonylyn version of Equinox was the only version that was available to the public; when Criterion released their two-disc set of Equinox back in 2006, they included both the original 1967 cut with the theatrical cut on the same disc (both with commentaries) for direct comparison. While neither cut are examples of horror filmmaking at its finest, the differences between the original edit and theatrical edit are astonishing and reflect how much the fans got right--fans who meticulously studied the craftsmanship that went into their favorite movies--and how much the so-called professionals got wrong.

Read on for my complete comparison of the two versions of Equinox, and how no movie is too small for creative differences between creators and producers.

In both edits, Equinox is about a group of college students who travel to the cabin owned by college professor, Dr. Arthur Waterman (Fritz Leiber Jr.), to check up on him because of his recent absence from their campus. They arrive to find that the cabin has been torn apart and Waterman is missing. Their search for the professor leads them to a mysterious text called the Book of the Damned that is filled with ancient inscriptions and spells intended to open a portal to a demonic parallel world--a portal that Waterman has already opened....

What Equinox is widely known for is that it features the early work of three special effects artists who would later work on some of the most popular films of the 70s, 80s, and 90s. These artists were Dennis Muren (Star Wars, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, E.T., Terminator 2, Jurassic Park, A.I., War of the Worlds), Dave Allen (The Howling, Willow, Ghostbusters II, Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, The Arrival) and Jim Danforth (Clash of the Titans, Creepshow, The Thing, The Neverending Story, Day of the Dead, Prince of Darkness). Muren produced the film for only $6500 and he co-directed the original cut of Equinox with Mark Thomas McGee, who also wrote the film's script. Muren and Allen worked on the stop motion effects, while Danforth provided the cel animation and matte paintings.

A forced perspective shot from Equinox.

Essentially, Equinox is a demo reel for the early effects work of Muren, Allen and Danforth; that the demo reel also happens to have an intriguing and creative story--albeit a poorly acted, poorly scripted and somewhat disjointed story--is simply a bonus. Considering that the film was shot on a tiny budget with amateur talents, the end results are very impressive.

Many aspects of Equinox echo the influence that the horror and sci-fi fan culture of the early-to-mid 20th century had on budding young filmmakers; depending on how you look at it, Equinox is a love letter of sorts to the creature features of that era. Muren and Allen were devoted fans of pioneering stop motion animators Willis O'Brien and Ray Harryhausen, and several of the effects scenes in Equinox are clearly influenced by O'Brien and Harryhausen movies such as Mighty Joe Young and It Came from Beneath the Sea.

Forrest J. Ackerman makes an uncredited cameo in Equinox by lending his voice to an audio recording that plays early in the film (he also provided a video introduction for the Criterion Equinox set). Ackerman's contributions to the horror and science fiction genres were numerous, and his biggest legacy to the fans of those genres was a magazine he published called Famous Monsters of Filmland. Famous Monsters differed from other entertainment magazines of its time by focusing on the artistry that's performed behind the scenes, such as special effects and creature costume designs. Muren and his production crew must've been devoted acolytes of Ackerman's magazine and the movies it covered, because their love of classic creature features and the techniques that brought them to cinematic life is on display in each frame of their original cut of Equinox. Such open affection provides a sort of charm that offsets some of the amateur film's more uneven aspects.

The theatrical release poster for Equinox.
Dennis Muren and Mark Thomas McGee 
were not credited on this poster.

The theatrical version of Equinox saw the addition of new footage, footage that was produced by Jack H. Harris and written and directed by Jack Woods. Some of the new footage consisted of re-shoots of what was in the first version, while the other new footage added new scenes, new characters and new dialogue. Unfortunately, the new additions to the story add nothing of value to the film; if anything, Equinox becomes even worse because of it. The dialogue is more wooden and is loaded with redundant exposition, the new subplots weigh down the film's pacing, and some of the original effects footage was cut to accommodate the new footage (!). Adding insult to injury, the theatrical version of the film begins and ends the same way as the original version--which emphasizes exactly how useless the new footage is.

All I can figure is that Woods thought that Equinox would be his big break as a writer and director (hint: it wasn't), so he tried to put as much of his stamp on it as possible. It should also be noted here that the theatrical version of Equinox lists Woods as director and co-writer, while Muren's credit went from being the co-director and producer to just associate producer. Woods even put himself in front of the camera as a new character named Asmodeus, a demon who assumes the guise of a park ranger and exerts his sinister influence over young ladies by making funny faces at them before feeling them up (no, I'm not kidding). Considering that Harris made a name for himself by producing The Blob in 1958 for only $120,000, it's a shame that he was willing to let Woods run roughshod over the work that was so passionately and cost-effectively made by Muren and his crew.


Asmodeus (Jack Woods), as he grimaces, puckers, clenches 
and frowns his way into the soul of an innocent victim.

Equinox has long been rumored to have greatly influenced yet another low-budget cult classic, Sam Raimi's The Evil Dead. To be sure, the films are very different from each other, and the Evil Dead films (particularly Evil Dead 2) are much darker, scarier and better plotted than Equinox. However, the Evil Dead movies feature so many of the same details as Equinox--the cabin in the woods, the prominent role of a tape recorder, an ancient book of dark incantations that summons demonic creatures and opens portals to other worlds, a necklace that is key to warding off evil, a group of teenagers being attacked by monsters that appear and disappear, and so on--that it's hard to deny the connection. Click here to see a visual comparison between Equinox and the Evil Dead movies on The Lucid Nightmare site.


The way I see it, Equinox and The Evil Dead are low-budget bookends of sorts to the changes that horror cinema went through during the 70s. Equinox reflects the heavy influence of O'Brien, Harryhausen and Ackerman on one generation of horror film fans, whereas The Evil Dead reflects the heavy influence of George Romero, Tobe Hooper and Wes Craven on a later generation of horror film fans.


Because Equinox at its best is a cheap fan-made film, your interest in seeing it will greatly depend on how much you would like to see this kind of film from another time in film history. In other words, you don't watch Equinox to see a classic horror film; instead, you watch it to see an example of how fans from a particular era applied what they learned about the crafts practiced by their movie idols to a film they financed and produced on their own, and how that film was later changed for the worse by someone else for theatrical release.

I've seen plenty of movies that were released on DVD and Blu-ray as both a theatrical cut and a director's cut, but this is the first and only time I've seen this situation occur with a fan film. For that reason alone, I highly recommend Criterion's release of Equinox for anyone who is interested in horror and sci-fi fan culture. You should also try to see Criterion's Equinox if you believe that modern CGI-based special effects lack the creativity and finesse of older special effects techniques such as matte paintings, forced perspective and stop motion animation. Click here to read Glenn Erickson's review at DVD Talk of both discs that are in Criterion's set; however, if you are interested in seeing both versions of Equinox but have no interested in buying it, the first disc of the Criterion release is available for rental through Netflix.


In 1985, Equinox was distributed on VHS by 
Wizard Video under the title The Beast.




Zombie Attack Engagement Photos: Till Undead Apocalypse Do We Part

0 comments


Here's something you don't see every day: A series of engagement portrait photos that depict the happy soon-to-be-wed couple fighting off a member of the voraciously hungry undead. According to the Gothamist site, California photographer Amanda Rynda took the zombie attack photos at the request of the couple, who also provided their own zombie. Click here to see the complete set of engagement/zombie attack pics.

Zombie-themed marital activities are nothing new, although this is the first time that I've heard of a couple using a zombie attack as part of their engagement commemoration efforts. I suppose that couples who slay zombies together stay together, but I have yet to see anyone top last year's zombie wedding in Seattle where Bruce Campbell himself officiated the ceremony. For more examples of rotting, cannibalistic wedded bliss, check out the Zombie Wedding blog.



2D Movies That I Want to See in 3D

0 comments


With Hollywood cranking out one 3D movie after another, quite a few older 2D movies are hopping on the bandwagon through post-production conversion to 3D. George Lucas plans to re-release all six of the Star Wars movies in 3D, and James Cameron will do the same for Titanic. With that in mind, here is a chronological list of films that, if possible, I would like to see converted into high-quality 3D movies. Read on...


War of the Worlds (1953 and/or 2005)


I'm flexible regarding this title, since both of these adaptations of H.G. Wells' classic novel would be wonderful to see in 3D. If you convert George Pal's version, you get the golden, ominous manta ray-like alien war machines trashing Los Angeles in 3D. If you convert Steven Spielberg's version, you get the towering, jellyfish-like alien tripods and close-ups of people being vaporized into dust, with nothing but their clothing left behind, in 3D. It's a win-win situation in my book. In fact, if the 3D conversion of Pal's movie follows Spielberg's opinion regarding the digital remastering of movies for high-definition release, you'll get to see both the floating war machines AND the piano wires that supported them in glorious 3D!




Them! (1954)


According to various sources, this classic big bug movie was originally supposed to be both in color and in 3D. Unfortunately, as the movie's fictitious mutant ants got bigger its real-life budget got smaller, resulting in a 2D, black and white movie that only has a few seconds of color footage in its beginning. Being a big bug movie fan, I'd love to see how this film would've looked had its original budget permitted color and 3D. (While I'm strictly against colorization of black and white movies, I'll make an exception in this case if it is done well and in 3D.)



The Creature Walks Among Us (1956)


This may not be the best sequel to Creature from the Black Lagoon, but it's the only film in the Creature trilogy that's not in 3D. Converting this movie to 3D--as well as converting its two predecessors from anaglyph 3D to a modern 3D format--would make for a great 3D Creature triple feature and/or a fantastic 3D Blu-ray box set.



Tron (1982)


Disney, if you are seeing this post, please read the following three step plan very carefully. First, approach George Lucas. (Don't say that you don't know him because I know that you've worked with him before--you just re-launched his Star Tours ride in your theme parks, OK?) Then, ask if you can borrow whatever thingamajig or doodad he's using to convert his Star Wars movies to 3D. Finally, use this device to convert the original Tron and re-release it in the theaters and/or on Blu-ray. With the bajillion dollars of money you have stashed away, don't expect me to believe that you can't do this.



Gremlins and Gremlins 2 (1984 and 1990)


There are just too many scenes of inspired slapstick mayhem in both of Joe Dante's Gremlins movies that I can't imagine them not being converted into 3D. Because Dante's first award-winning foray into 3D cinema, The Hole (2009), has yet to be released in the US in its original 3D format (the only available version of this movie so far is the 2D DVD that was released in the UK, Scandinavia and Hong Kong), re-releasing his Gremlins movies in 3D would be one way to compensate for such an egregious injustice.



Ghostbusters (1984)


Given the number of nifty special effects that were used in this blockbuster movie, it would be the perfect candidate for 3D conversion. Ghosts, demon dogs, and nuclear-powered positronic energy beams that trash a classy hotel, all in 3D? Count me in! Furthermore, with Ghostbusters 3 stuck in pre-production limbo, a 3D re-release of the first film would be a more than adequate substitute.



Evil Dead 2 (1987)


Yet another example of humorous, absurd horror that would benefit greatly by being converted into the third dimension. I suppose that the other two Evil Dead movies should get the 3D treatment too, but I think the middle movie would make the best usage of the 3D format with its dynamic selection of camera tricks, special effects and feats of "splatstick" comedy. Groovy!



Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988)


There are plenty of other examples where live-action actors have co-mingled with hand-drawn, 2D characters, but this film by Robert Zemeckis is one of the most ambitious. Converting this film to 3D would enhance the film's already impressive visual illusion of flesh and blood characters interacting with those made of ink and paint. Furthermore, where else would you be able to see both Bugs Bunny and Mickey Mouse in 3D?



Arachnophobia (1990)


Somewhere out there, movie gimmick master William Castle is looking at our new CGI and 3D technology and wondering why nobody has made a 3D CGI film about a horde of tiny, killer bugs. This could be a film about a swarm of flying killer insects, which appear to fly out of the screen and into the audience (along with a surround sound audio track of buzzing to make the audience feel immersed inside of the swarm), or a film about a swarm of creepy, crawly killer insects that appear to scurry out of the screen (along with carefully placed buzzers hidden in seats throughout the theater and activated randomly during these scenes). Until this kind of movie is made, someone might as well convert Arachnophobia from 2D to 3D.



The Spider-Man trilogy (2002-2007)


There are plenty of superhero movies out there that would probably look great in 3D. Marvel has taken notice: Both Thor and Captain America are being released in both 2D and 3D versions. Yet I think that the superhero movies that would look the most spectacular in 3D would be Sam Raimi's Spider-Man movies. Spidey's mid-air acrobatics and high-flying duels with villains such as the Green Goblin and Dr. Octopus are perfect for the 3D format. (Case in point: The Universal Studio Theme Park's The Amazing Adventures of Spider-Man 3D simulator ride.) If Sony refuses 3D conversions to be made of the Spider-Man films that they own, Marvel could always do it for the Iron Man movies, The Incredible Hulk, or the short-lived computer animated Spider-Man TV series.



Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow (2004)


As pulp sci-fi films go, Sky Captain has to be the most underrated. Even though Star Wars and its countless knockoffs modeled their narratives after pulp sci-fi from the 30s, 40s and 50s, they utilized a dirty, gritty "used universe" look. In contrast, Sky Captain took the sleek and shiny pulp sci-fi art from the same era and gleefully made sweet, sweet cinematic love to it on the silver screen. Thus, to see such artwork get both the high-def CGI treatment AND high-quality 3D conversion would be every pulp sci-fi aficionado's dream come true.



Anything by Ray Harryhausen


When Tim Burton and Henry Selick's The Nightmare Before Christmas movie was re-released in 3D, it proved that 2D stop-motion animation could be successfully converted to 3D. Thus, why not perform 3D conversions for the work done by one of the most influential stop-motion pioneers, Ray Harryhausen? Jason and the Argonauts, Mysterious Island, Earth vs. the Flying Saucers, 20 Million Miles to Earth ... the list goes on and on of works that he created that are excellent candidates for conversion to 3D.




Epic Fail: A Review of Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash: The Nightmare Warriors

0 comments


Franchise crossovers are tricky things. They can be a blast when characters from different narrative universes meet in a single setting and share an adventure, or beat the crap out of each other, or beat the crap out of each other and then share an adventure. This stuff isn't high art; it's more of a treat for franchise fans than anything else, which is good news if you're a franchise fan.

However, even fan-friendly stuff like crossovers still have to obey a few rules to be enjoyable stories and not just meandering, clueless cash-ins of popular franchise brand names. For starters, it helps to provide some kind of balance between the franchises that appear in the story, so that both sides have some kind of direct involvement in the story. There's a big difference between a crossover and a guest appearance: Fans of a particular franchise in a crossover will feel cheated if their side doesn't get enough time in the spotlight, and it won't help the crossover narrative achieve a sense of tonal and plot consistency if certain elements just seem forced into the story with little sense of explanation or continuity.

To ensure that narrative balance is achieved, the franchises within the crossover should share some kind of thematic commonality. Dark Horse's original Aliens vs. Predator comic book miniseries worked well because both franchises dealt with killer extraterrestrials, so it didn't require much narrative acrobatics to explain what these two monsters were doing together in the same story. (In contrast, one of the more frustrating aspects of the Alien vs. Predator movie was the "ancient astronaut" subplot that took up so much time but didn't add much to the story, except to provide a convoluted excuse as to why the movie takes place in the arctic.) The same applies to Robocop vs. Terminator: Both franchises revolve around technology that has run amok, so it doesn't take much effort to put them together in the same setting. On the other hand, when two franchises that have nothing in common are forced together into the same story, the results can be ugly. Case in point: The DC Universe/Looney Tunes comic book crossover, two franchises that share no commonality other than that Warner Brothers owns both of them.


This brings me to the focus of this post, my review of Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash: The Nightmare Warriors. Nightmare Warriors is billed as third part of the Freddy vs. Jason "trilogy", with the first two parts being the Freddy vs. Jason movie and the Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash comic book miniseries. Read on for my review of Nightmare Warriors, which includes a brief look back at its two predecessors.

When Freddy vs. Jason came out back in 2003, I thought it was a hoot. I enjoyed seeing Robert Englund playing Freddy Krueger one last time, and Ronny Yu's direction featured the right blend of gory horror and violent lunacy. The subplot involving the Westin Hills psychiatric facility and Hypnocil not only made ample use of ideas introduced in previous Nightmare on Elm Street movies, but it also provided an effectively morbid counterweight to the alliance/conflict between Freddy and Jason. Yet the most remarkable thing about this crossover was how long it took to happen at all and when it finally did happen, it was worth the wait. The studios first considered this crossover back in 1987, and it resulted in 18 unused scripts before Freddy vs. Jason was actually made (see the extras on the DVD for more details). Click here for some additional thoughts on Freddy vs. Jason.


The success of Freddy vs. Jason prompted the studios to consider a sequel (naturally), and one of the sequel ideas that quickly bubbled to the surface was to add the character of Ashley "Ash" Williams from the Evil Dead movies to the mix. A treatment for Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash was drafted, but never produced. So while a sequel to Freddy vs. Jason remains unmade, Wildstorm and Dynamite Entertainment later contacted Jeff Katz, the author of the Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash treatment, to work with James Kuhoric to rework the treatment into a six-issue comic book miniseries.

I picked up the trade paperback collection of Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash after it was published in September 2007. It's not as good as Freddy vs. Jason, the artwork by Jason Craig is very uneven, and I doubt that it would've worked as a movie. Nevertheless, Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash has its share of noteworthy moments for avid fans. It incorporates enough elements from each of the three franchises so that it feels like a complete, coherent story. Perhaps the most intriguing idea in this crossover story was the suggestion that Jason Vorhees' mother used the Necronomicon to bring Jason back from the dead (a plot thread that was hinted at in the ninth Friday the 13th movie), which is how Freddy learns about the cursed book. It's also fun to see Ash's car again, his seemingly indestructible 1973 Oldsmobile Delta 88 Royale--it's the same car that makes cameo appearances in many of Sam Raimi's other films outside of the Evil Dead series.

Katz, Kuhoric and Craig came back in 2009 to do Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash: The Nightmare Warriors. Nightmare Warriors was originally slated to be a twelve issue miniseries, but it was cut down to six issues. Katz and Kuhoric aimed to tell a much more ambitious story in this sequel, setting it up to serve as a definitive ending to the stories of several surviving characters from the Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street movies. Unfortunately, while Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash is an amusing romp, Nightmare Warriors is an ambitious disappointment.

Katz and Kuhoric obviously didn't trim their original idea for a sequel when the miniseries' number of issues was cut from twelve to six. Nightmare Warriors tries to fit too many characters and plot threads into a narrative space that's too small to accommodate them and as a result, it becomes little more than a collage of franchise parts that never really fit together into a whole story. Reading it felt like reading Katz and Kuhoric's Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street fanboy wish list, not a gleefully gruesome story that horror fans crave. The characters feel interchangeable and its two intersecting plot arcs--the assembly of a support group for Freddy and Jason survivors and the government's interest in the Necronomicon--read like shallow, uninspired excuses to bring the characters together instead of actual plot arcs. As before, Craig's quality of artwork continues to vary from page to page, thus further dulling the story's overall visual impact.

Such narrative overcrowding of Nightmare Warriors leads it to its biggest flaw, at least as crossovers go: a lack of balance between the participating franchises. There are so many characters and ideas from the Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street franchises that the Evil Dead components of the story--namely Ash, the Necronomicon, and the Deadites--feel like they've been pushed aside and only serve the story in the most perfunctory sense. If anything, such an imbalance calls attention to the fact that the Evil Dead franchise isn't a slasher franchise, thus making Ash's placement in the story that much more awkward. Katz and Kuhoric's plot point that slasher attack survivors have an inner strength that makes them much more capable of beating supernatural villains would've worked perfectly within the Hack/Slash comic book series (say, Freddy vs. Jason vs. Hack/Slash) than with a crossover that involves Evil Dead.


Had Katz and Kuhoric kept their ambitions in check and paid closer attention to what makes crossovers succeed, Nightmare Warriors could have been a great miniseries. Since Nightmare Warriors was intended to be a concluding chapter in a trilogy, it should have been a story that expands directly from Freddy vs. Jason and Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash instead of returning to two of the original franchises to continue their stories. For example, since she brought Jason back from the dead by using the Necronomicon, Pamela Vorhees could have returned in the third part of the trilogy as some kind of Deadite witch (think of something along the lines of the cellar ghoul from Evil Dead 2) who has a seething grudge against both Freddy and Ash for what they did to her boy in the previous two chapters--imagine the kind of awesome bloodbath that would have been!

In summary, I can't recommend Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash: The Nightmare Warriors, even to die-hard fans of Freddy, Jason and Ash. Horror buffs are better off satiating their crossover cravings elsewhere.